2013年11月26日 星期二

Can banks charge for deposit? Really? (26 Nov 2013)

Can banks charge for deposit?  Really?

The market has discussed the “when” and “how” the US could taper its Quantitative Easing.  The USD 85 billion a month Asset Purchase Scheme is viewed to be vital in keeping the world rotating.  Well, at least it keeps the bull running in the US and European stock markets.  The recent gesture from the US Fed and its Chairman Bernanke is interesting to put it mildly.  Ben Bernanke is paid to make sure the world does not fully understand his words.  Yet, many people have to make a living in knowing what Uncle Ben is saying and how that could affect the market.  Uncle Ben and his team, the Federal Open Market Committee, have said they would taper its bond buying probably in the “coming meetings”.  If the US Fed is slowing down the money printing machine, it wants someone else to throw money into the system.  And the lucky ones are BANKS!  One potential outcome is for the Fed to pay banks a lower interest for putting money with Fed itself.  Currently, Fed is paying 0.25% for banks to park their reserves (versus the European Central Bank paying 0.1%).  If the Fed starts to pay less, Bernanke and his colleagues are hoping banks would put their money to work and perhaps lend to some corporates.  Well, most human beings are lazy by nature and bankers are no difference.  The banks are thinking of paying their customers less for their deposit as a result of Fed paying the banks less.  Wait a minute.  Bank clients are already getting practically zero interest from their USD deposit.  Similarly in UK, Germany or other healthier EU countries, bank clients are getting donuts from their bank deposits.  So, getting even less could means clients will need to pay the banks for looking after their money.  That’s a very scary thought for retirees or companies that are cash rich.  This is the final push to the investors through the revolving door into the casino of stocks, bonds and other securities.  This could be what the Fed wants.  By cutting the rate Fed pays for bank reserves, the bank clients would put their money to corporate bonds or shares.

With determination, the US Dollar has successfully weakened against the British Pounds.  As of 26 November, it is USD 1.6153 to GBP 1 and this is pretty much as strong as the GBP has been against the USD in 2013.  The peak was 1.6381 on 2 January, 2013 and the bottom was 1.4814 on 9 July, 2013.  The Euro peaked against the US Dollar at 1.3832 on 25 Oct, 2013.  It is now back to 1.3532 level which is still a lot stronger than the year low at 1.2746 on 4 April, 2013.  While USD is weak due to Fed relax monetary policy, positive news or the expectation of positive news in US real economy is preventing the US Dollar to weaken further this year.

Another interesting currency is Gold which is like a world currency without a government monetary policy.  Gold has been drifting south since September from USD 1415 per ounce to USD 1253 as of 25 November.  The year low was USD 1180.50 on 28 June, 2013.  Gold, in some views, is a hedge against a few purposes such as inflation, US default risk, Euro zone breakdown.  Now all 3 troubles seem so far away.   It looks as though the stock market is here to stay.  Some believe gold prices have to fade.

UK stock investors are likely to have a good year in 2013 with FTSE100 Index going up 13.5% year to date as of 25 November, 2011.  Further upside this year could be a big ask with Christmas approaching as fund managers and institutional investors taking holiday.  The overall tapering gesture from US Fed could put a lid to cool off the US bull market.  China has been lagging behind the West in terms of stock market performance.  In November, China had its Third Plenary Session of the 18th Central Committee.  It is a very long name for a very big communists gathering.  One big outcome is that the Chinese government is relaxing its one child policy.  It sounds strange to the West that the Chinese government could limit the number of children a couple could have.  Currently, only if both parents are single child, they could have the second child.  The proposed change is that if one of the parents is a single child, the couple could have the second child.  This brings some demographic dividend to China.  Overall, President Xi Jinping and his government seems to have got the steering wheel of the nation firmly and even famed investor Jim Rogers recently interviews are giving positive comments over the Chinese stock market.